Triple

T27754452
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject San José copper–gold mine E701300 entity
Predicate numberOfMinersTrappedIn2010Accident P198959 FINISHED
Object 33 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 33 | Statement: [San José copper–gold mine, numberOfMinersTrappedIn2010Accident, 33]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberOfMinersTrappedIn2010Accident
Context triple: [San José copper–gold mine, numberOfMinersTrappedIn2010Accident, 33]
  • A. mineOfAccident
    Indicates that a mine is the location or source where an accident occurred.
  • B. miningDisaster
    Indicates a disastrous event occurring in the context of mining operations, typically involving significant damage, injury, or loss of life.
  • C. firstContactWithMinersDayOfAccident
    Indicates the date on which initial contact was made with the miners on the day the accident occurred.
  • D. miningMinisterDuringAccident
    Indicates that the subject served as the mining minister at the time when the specified accident occurred.
  • E. numberOfPeopleTrapped
    Indicates the count of individuals who are currently trapped in a given situation or location.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a5193808190816eb7d0020b2d87 completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff17be6ad48190963206f2619b1b28 completed May 9, 2026, 11:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff1724ba24819092c928fcbcb286ec completed May 9, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff17bda59c8190b27c524f3e01c6df completed May 9, 2026, 11:17 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:22 p.m.