Triple

T27751920
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Patwa family E701232 entity
Predicate heritageStatusOfLegacy P923 FINISHED
Object protected monument LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protected monument | Statement: [Patwa family, heritageStatusOfLegacy, protected monument]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heritageStatusOfLegacy
Context triple: [Patwa family, heritageStatusOfLegacy, protected monument]
  • A. heritageStatus chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular cultural, historical, or natural heritage designation or protection status.
  • B. hasLegacyAt
    Indicates that an entity has left a lasting impact, influence, or heritage associated with a particular place or context.
  • C. hasLegacy
    Indicates that an entity leaves behind a lasting impact, influence, or inheritance that continues to exist or be recognized over time.
  • D. isConsideredLegacy
    Indicates that something is regarded as outdated or superseded, typically maintained only for backward compatibility or historical reasons.
  • E. hasHeritageStatusWithin
    Indicates that something holds a recognized heritage designation or status within a specified area, jurisdiction, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a5193808190816eb7d0020b2d87 completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6cee45590819086e489bfccbe4ac3 completed May 3, 2026, 4:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cc1188708190b8f0f56e595e6057 completed May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:21 p.m.