Triple

T27736114
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ParameterizedThreadStart E697531 entity
Predicate supportsAnonymousMethods P201288 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [ParameterizedThreadStart, supportsAnonymousMethods, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsAnonymousMethods
Context triple: [ParameterizedThreadStart, supportsAnonymousMethods, true]
  • A. usesMethods
    Indicates that one entity employs, applies, or relies on specific methods or techniques to perform an action or achieve a result.
  • B. supportsAnnotations
    Indicates that one entity is capable of holding, displaying, or working with annotations associated with another entity or its content.
  • C. usesAnonymousInspectors
    Indicates that an entity employs inspectors whose identities are concealed or not disclosed while performing inspections.
  • D. supportsAnonymousEditing
    Indicates that the subject allows users to make edits or changes without requiring them to be identified or authenticated.
  • E. supportsAsyncInvoke
    Indicates that one entity can initiate and handle asynchronous invocations or operations on another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffe6e2eb688190a45fd2c6415cd86a completed May 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffe65939488190a35b9c2e9c7ad868 completed May 10, 2026, 1:58 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffe6e21f748190a18dfe0878d397f7 completed May 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:12 p.m.