Triple

T27734215
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CollectionBase E697493 entity
Predicate isConsideredLegacy P167786 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [CollectionBase, isConsideredLegacy, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConsideredLegacy
Context triple: [CollectionBase, isConsideredLegacy, true]
  • A. hasLegacy
    Indicates that an entity leaves behind a lasting impact, influence, or inheritance that continues to exist or be recognized over time.
  • B. hasLegacyAt
    Indicates that an entity has left a lasting impact, influence, or heritage associated with a particular place or context.
  • C. usesLegacyOf
    Indicates that one entity makes use of, builds upon, or derives benefit from the historical work, reputation, or established influence of another entity.
  • D. hasPartInLegacy
    Indicates that an entity includes another entity as a component or constituent specifically within its legacy or historically inherited structure.
  • E. isLegacyCharacterFor
    Indicates that one entity is an older, previously established character associated with or originating from the context, storyline, or franchise of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66cf092c881908d7034c9c2bc61d5 completed May 2, 2026, 9:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66abddc448190a488852f8abdeb2c completed May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f66c59de9881909ebbb7b0ae7ab495 completed May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:12 p.m.