Triple
T27734035
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hashtable |
E697490
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeSynchronized |
P180407
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hashtable, canBeSynchronized, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeSynchronized Context triple: [Hashtable, canBeSynchronized, true]
-
A.
synchronizesWith
Indicates that two or more entities coordinate their states or activities so that they occur in step or remain temporally consistent with each other.
-
B.
isSelfSynchronizing
Indicates that a process, system, or component can automatically align its timing or state with others without requiring external coordination or control.
-
C.
canSyncVia
Indicates that one entity is able to synchronize data or state with another entity using a specified method or channel.
-
D.
synchronizationType
Indicates the specific manner or mode in which two or more processes, systems, or events are coordinated to operate in temporal or state alignment.
-
E.
canBeLocked
Indicates that an entity has the capability to be secured or made inaccessible by applying a lock or locking mechanism.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f74062b9388190b30546cf700a825c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73c802b848190b61a416b7488bd96 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f74061c440819080434155c2d60341 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:12 p.m.