Triple
T27732909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | System.TimeSpan |
E697470
|
entity |
| Predicate | CLSCompliant |
P163120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [System.TimeSpan, CLSCompliant, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: CLSCompliant Context triple: [System.TimeSpan, CLSCompliant, true]
-
A.
isCLSCompliant
chosen
Indicates that an element (such as code, assembly, or library) adheres to the Common Language Specification rules for interoperability across .NET languages.
-
B.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
C.
indicatesComplianceWith
Indicates that one entity conforms to, satisfies, or adheres to the rules, standards, or requirements specified by another entity or framework.
-
D.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
E.
compliedWith
Indicates that one entity has acted in accordance with, or fulfilled the requirements of, another entity’s rules, requests, or standards.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641dc8ff48190ab575d855616580c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:12 p.m.