Triple

T27731320
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject System.SerializableAttribute E697436 entity
Predicate hasAttributeUsage P163524 FINISHED
Object AttributeTargets.Class LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AttributeTargets.Class | Statement: [System.SerializableAttribute, hasAttributeUsage, AttributeTargets.Class]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAttributeUsage
Context triple: [System.SerializableAttribute, hasAttributeUsage, AttributeTargets.Class]
  • A. usesAttribute
    Indicates that one entity employs, relies on, or makes use of a specific attribute of another entity in performing an action or defining a relationship.
  • B. hasVariantUsage
    Indicates that an entity is used in an alternative or non-standard way compared to its primary or canonical usage.
  • C. hasUsageLevel
    Indicates the degree or intensity with which something is used or utilized.
  • D. holdsAttribute
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular attribute or property.
  • E. hasPresentUse
    Indicates that an entity is currently being used or serving a particular function at the present time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6397b64f881909d811225e57aac5e completed May 2, 2026, 5:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6370c8c7c8190a02ea82847bb6e76 completed May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f63893cc188190883ac9321a95d2dc completed May 2, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:11 p.m.