Triple
T27720728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Village of Sand Lake |
E698945
|
entity |
| Predicate | stateLegalSystem |
P605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Michigan law |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan law | Statement: [Village of Sand Lake, stateLegalSystem, Michigan law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateLegalSystem Context triple: [Village of Sand Lake, stateLegalSystem, Michigan law]
-
A.
countryOfLegalSystem
Indicates the relationship between a legal system and the country in which that legal system is officially established or applied.
-
B.
legalSystem
chosen
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
C.
legalSystemRegion
Indicates the geographic or jurisdictional region within which a particular legal system is applicable or in force.
-
D.
stateOfLaw
Indicates that a specified legal condition, rule, or status is currently in force or applicable within a given jurisdiction or context.
-
E.
stateLawOf
Indicates that one entity is a law or legal provision that is in force within, or specifically governs, a particular state or subnational jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef591012dc8190a6f1ec994f9f7ff7 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f757898fe48190b124dc7301672623 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f754c484348190948d2a04ff228fb1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:06 p.m.