Triple
T27712149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1962 Canadian federal election |
E698717
|
entity |
| Predicate | leader4VoteShare |
P172361
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 9.2% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 9.2% | Statement: [1962 Canadian federal election, leader4VoteShare, 9.2%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leader4VoteShare Context triple: [1962 Canadian federal election, leader4VoteShare, 9.2%]
-
A.
leader2VoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the second-ranked leader or leading candidate in an election or poll.
-
B.
leader4PopularVote
Indicates that a leader holds their position as a result of receiving the highest number of votes in a popular election.
-
C.
numberOfVoters
Indicates the total count of individuals who participated in a particular vote or election.
-
D.
AlliancePopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by a political alliance in an election relative to all valid votes cast.
-
E.
numberOfSeatsWon
Indicates the quantity of seats secured by an entity (such as a party or candidate) in an election or representative body.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590f655c81909f93893b3b3219b2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa1c555081908787dbf76147f180 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6aaf31a548190b2f792ff4b8c002a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:02 p.m.