Triple
T27712124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1962 Canadian federal election |
E698717
|
entity |
| Predicate | leader1PopularVote |
P9220
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2792017 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2792017 | Statement: [1962 Canadian federal election, leader1PopularVote, 2792017]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leader1PopularVote Context triple: [1962 Canadian federal election, leader1PopularVote, 2792017]
-
A.
popularVoteWinner
Indicates that the subject is the candidate who received the highest number of individual votes cast by the electorate in an election.
-
B.
LabourPopularVote
Indicates the proportion of total votes cast in an election that were received by the Labour Party.
-
C.
smithPopularVote
Indicates that Smith received a specified number or share of votes in a popular vote election or ballot.
-
D.
currentDeFactoLeader
Indicates that the specified person is the individual who effectively holds and exercises the highest leadership authority over the given entity at the present time, regardless of formal or legal title.
-
E.
popularVotes
chosen
Indicates the number of votes an entity (such as a candidate or option) receives directly from individual voters in an election or decision process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590f655c81909f93893b3b3219b2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63fd6c68481908c542aa03e297b9c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6895f0819088655277e45859a8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:02 p.m.