Triple

T27692262
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject TLS heartbeat extension E698189 entity
Predicate associatedVulnerability P67454 FINISHED
Object Heartbleed NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Heartbleed | Statement: [TLS heartbeat extension, associatedVulnerability, Heartbleed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedVulnerability
Context triple: [TLS heartbeat extension, associatedVulnerability, Heartbleed]
  • A. associatedWithVulnerability chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, affected by, or relevant to a specific vulnerability or security weakness.
  • B. CVEIdentifier
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier, uniquely referencing a documented security vulnerability.
  • C. securityVulnerability
    Indicates that an entity has a weakness or flaw that could be exploited to compromise its security.
  • D. vulnerabilitySource
    Indicates that one entity is the origin, cause, or contributing factor of another entity’s vulnerability or weakness.
  • E. vulnerabilityType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of vulnerability associated with an entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef590df8708190af5488f0638e790c completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0056174c908190be99c91a70393e47 completed May 10, 2026, 9:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00538e7e08819091ecd4316cd641a1 completed May 10, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:52 p.m.