Triple

T27678239
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject yellow crazy ant E697836 entity
Predicate controlChallenges P179204 FINISHED
Object large supercolony size LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: large supercolony size | Statement: [yellow crazy ant, controlChallenges, large supercolony size]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: controlChallenges
Context triple: [yellow crazy ant, controlChallenges, large supercolony size]
  • A. trainingChallenges
    Indicates difficulties, obstacles, or problems encountered during a training process or training-related activities.
  • B. challengesModel
    Indicates that one entity questions, disputes, or puts to the test the validity, performance, or assumptions of another entity’s model.
  • C. facedChallenges
    Indicates that an entity has encountered and had to deal with difficulties, obstacles, or adverse conditions.
  • D. operationalChallenge
    Indicates that an entity faces difficulties, obstacles, or inefficiencies in carrying out its regular operations or processes.
  • E. currentChallenges
    Indicates the difficulties or obstacles an entity is presently facing or dealing with.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef590d458c81909583290c3cd0478b completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7201e241c819092d56a7bb99dc94d completed May 3, 2026, 10:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f71cc405c08190863565609a4c8499 completed May 3, 2026, 10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f71f8df5d48190944fbfbd9d573868 completed May 3, 2026, 10:12 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:45 p.m.