Triple
T27668142
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | As You Were |
E697284
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresContemporaryProduction |
P145289
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [As You Were, featuresContemporaryProduction, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresContemporaryProduction Context triple: [As You Were, featuresContemporaryProduction, true]
-
A.
contemporaryDescription
Indicates that one entity provides a description or account of another entity that is current or relevant to the same time period.
-
B.
modernProduction
chosen
Indicates that something is created, manufactured, or staged using contemporary methods, technologies, or stylistic approaches.
-
C.
currentProduction
Indicates that an entity is presently engaged in producing, manufacturing, or generating another entity or output.
-
D.
contemporaryProcess
Indicates that one process occurs in the same time period as, or overlaps temporally with, another process.
-
E.
contemporaryTendency
Indicates that one entity reflects, aligns with, or exemplifies a prevailing trend, style, or tendency of the same time period as another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590b85a4819083ec7c12bd3c9c10 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd68abf52881909c5a390c362b7c59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd6812d0c88190930d8fa2d4b92490 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:39 p.m.