Triple
T27663143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CAA |
E697169
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsInheritance |
P181840
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [CAA, supportsInheritance, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsInheritance Context triple: [CAA, supportsInheritance, yes]
-
A.
supportsConfigInheritance
Indicates that one configuration can derive from and reuse settings defined in another configuration.
-
B.
usesInheritanceFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity relies on or incorporates another entity through an inheritance-based relationship, typically extending or reusing its structure or behavior.
-
C.
requiresInheritance
Indicates that one entity must inherit from or extend another entity in order for a condition, usage, or relationship to be valid.
-
D.
losesInheritanceThrough
Indicates that one party forfeits or is disqualified from receiving an inheritance as a consequence of another specified party or condition.
-
E.
supportsImplementationOf
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary resources, framework, or assistance for another entity to be carried out, realized, or put into practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590b85a4819083ec7c12bd3c9c10 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff9361943c81909544203cbc998a69 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff913138a08190b59bdc9d8d199eb3 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:37 p.m.