Triple
T27631659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Schramm Inc. |
E696353
|
entity |
| Predicate | providedDrillingRigFor |
P180013
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plan B rescue shaft in 2010 Copiapó mining accident |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plan B rescue shaft in 2010 Copiapó mining accident | Statement: [Schramm Inc., providedDrillingRigFor, Plan B rescue shaft in 2010 Copiapó mining accident]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providedDrillingRigFor Context triple: [Schramm Inc., providedDrillingRigFor, Plan B rescue shaft in 2010 Copiapó mining accident]
-
A.
hasDrillingCapability
Indicates that an entity possesses the ability or functionality to perform drilling operations.
-
B.
drillingSite
Indicates a location where drilling activities are conducted or intended to occur.
-
C.
drillingMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to perform a drilling operation in a given context.
-
D.
usedDrill
Indicates that an entity operated or employed a drill as a tool to perform some action or task.
-
E.
hasDrillHolesFrom
Indicates that an object bears drill holes that were created by another specified entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef59092c8881908114ad184248cc46 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7308a096081909d66a56f3c926806 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72a00c5f081908b6539d15baf4e12 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f730890a008190a882f7828f1c9162 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:21 p.m.