Triple
T2761770
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Helvering v. Horst |
E61236
|
entity |
| Predicate | respondent |
P2238
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Horst
Horst is the taxpayer involved as the respondent in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court tax case Helvering v. Horst, which helped define the assignment-of-income doctrine.
|
E296551
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Horst | Statement: [Helvering v. Horst, respondent, Horst]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Horst Context triple: [Helvering v. Horst, respondent, Horst]
-
A.
Erasbach
Erasbach is a small locality in Bavaria, Germany, best known as the birthplace of the composer Christoph Willibald Gluck.
-
B.
Löhr
Löhr is a German-language surname borne by various notable individuals, including figures in military, arts, and public life.
-
C.
Haldenstein
Haldenstein is a small Swiss village in the canton of Graubünden, known in architecture circles as the longtime base of renowned architect Peter Zumthor.
-
D.
Osthoff
Osthoff is a German-language surname borne by various individuals, including those of notable public and historical prominence.
-
E.
Hauke
Hauke is a Germanic given name, particularly common in Northern Germany, that is cognate with the English name Hugh.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Horst Triple: [Helvering v. Horst, respondent, Horst]
Generated description
Horst is the taxpayer involved as the respondent in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court tax case Helvering v. Horst, which helped define the assignment-of-income doctrine.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Horst Target entity description: Horst is the taxpayer involved as the respondent in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court tax case Helvering v. Horst, which helped define the assignment-of-income doctrine.
-
A.
Erasbach
Erasbach is a small locality in Bavaria, Germany, best known as the birthplace of the composer Christoph Willibald Gluck.
-
B.
Löhr
Löhr is a German-language surname borne by various notable individuals, including figures in military, arts, and public life.
-
C.
Haldenstein
Haldenstein is a small Swiss village in the canton of Graubünden, known in architecture circles as the longtime base of renowned architect Peter Zumthor.
-
D.
Osthoff
Osthoff is a German-language surname borne by various individuals, including those of notable public and historical prominence.
-
E.
Hauke
Hauke is a Germanic given name, particularly common in Northern Germany, that is cognate with the English name Hugh.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7bab6c8190a5c2efef19a8ef34 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdd5072548190946f037c38aabb02 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:09 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afc04365448190b37e5ed16c16d650 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:54 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69afc0b6368081908e2520ac6680a409 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:56 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69afc145e61881908c0eeae455b02a78 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:57 p.m.