Triple
T27613461
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OpenID 2.0 |
E700379
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | decentralized authentication protocol |
C994
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: decentralized authentication protocol Context triple: [OpenID 2.0, instanceOf, decentralized authentication protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol
chosen
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
C.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
D.
blockchain-based protocol
A blockchain-based protocol is a decentralized set of rules and procedures encoded on a distributed ledger that governs how participants validate, record, and agree on transactions or data without relying on a central authority.
-
E.
fault-tolerant consensus protocol
A fault-tolerant consensus protocol is a distributed algorithm that enables a group of nodes to reliably agree on a shared state or value even when some nodes fail or behave maliciously.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4f1d9c8190b0705acda054368d |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:12 p.m.