Triple
T27612303
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 6186 |
E700356
|
entity |
| Predicate | updatesPracticeFor |
P162748
|
FINISHED |
| Object | email client configuration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: email client configuration | Statement: [RFC 6186, updatesPracticeFor, email client configuration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: updatesPracticeFor Context triple: [RFC 6186, updatesPracticeFor, email client configuration]
-
A.
updatesPracticesFrom
Indicates that one entity revises or improves its practices, methods, or procedures based on those of another entity.
-
B.
updated
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or status.
-
C.
updateFor
Indicates that one entity is modified or refreshed in response to changes or conditions associated with another entity.
-
D.
updatedIn
Indicates that an entity has undergone a change or modification within a specified time period or version context.
-
E.
restoresPractice
Indicates that an entity brings a previously existing practice back into use or reestablishes it after a period of decline or discontinuation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4f1d9c8190b0705acda054368d |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f630a10e808190baf5d28151c1063e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1921008190a62675a31f66a875 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62d14c24c81909e86678c1b5fd429 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:11 p.m.