Triple
T27609611
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mutwa embroidery |
E700276
|
entity |
| Predicate | artFormStatus |
P162742
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intangible cultural heritage of Kutch region |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intangible cultural heritage of Kutch region | Statement: [Mutwa embroidery, artFormStatus, intangible cultural heritage of Kutch region]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artFormStatus Context triple: [Mutwa embroidery, artFormStatus, intangible cultural heritage of Kutch region]
-
A.
artForm
Indicates the type or category of artistic expression that characterizes or defines something (e.g., painting, music, dance).
-
B.
artFormCreated
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of a particular artistic form, style, or genre associated with the other entity.
-
C.
artFormIntegration
Indicates the incorporation or blending of one artistic form or medium into another within a unified creative work or practice.
-
D.
artFormAppreciated
Indicates that an entity recognizes, values, or takes pleasure in a particular form of art.
-
E.
hasArtFormPresented
Indicates that an entity presents, showcases, or features a particular art form.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4e2e208190b63b7268f405785c |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6309e79108190a5fa90c4484eeb22 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1921008190a62675a31f66a875 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62d14c24c81909e86678c1b5fd429 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.