Triple

T27606306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kawawachikamach E700188 entity
Predicate hasProvincialLaw P196072 FINISHED
Object Quebec law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Quebec law | Statement: [Kawawachikamach, hasProvincialLaw, Quebec law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProvincialLaw
Context triple: [Kawawachikamach, hasProvincialLaw, Quebec law]
  • A. isProvincial
    Indicates that something belongs to, is characteristic of, or is administered at the level of a province rather than a national or local level.
  • B. hasStatuteLaw
    Indicates that a jurisdiction or entity is governed by, or possesses, a body of formal written laws enacted by a legislative authority.
  • C. stateLawOf
    Indicates that one entity is a law or legal provision that is in force within, or specifically governs, a particular state or subnational jurisdiction.
  • D. hasLocalOrdinances
    Indicates that a governing body or jurisdiction has established and enacted specific local ordinances or regulations.
  • E. provincialLevelJurisdiction
    Indicates that an entity has legal or administrative authority at the provincial (subnational) level within a country.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a4e2e208190b63b7268f405785c completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe066d62b48190867df334039be786 completed May 8, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe03afde3c8190a5b9b0778d19eb1a completed May 8, 2026, 3:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe066b623c819085205fbea901e3cf completed May 8, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:09 p.m.