Triple
T27596050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Niles |
E699899
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipWithC.C. Babcock |
P200221
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Antagonistic banter |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Antagonistic banter | Statement: [Niles, relationshipWithC.C. Babcock, Antagonistic banter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithC.C. Babcock Context triple: [Niles, relationshipWithC.C. Babcock, Antagonistic banter]
-
A.
worksInCloseRelationshipWith
Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
-
B.
hasPoliticalRelationshipWith
Indicates a political connection or association between two entities, such as alliances, rivalries, collaborations, or other forms of political interaction.
-
C.
hasPoliticalRelationship
Indicates a political connection or association that exists between two entities, such as alliances, rivalries, or other formal or informal political ties.
-
D.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
E.
hasAllegedRelationshipWith
Indicates a claimed or suspected relationship between two entities that is not confirmed as factual.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4d71f081909a1235763206b691 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff7bc112088190851501fb2a16103d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff7b45507c81909753866ad733601a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff7bbfa4b08190b11e84861706b349 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:06 p.m.