Triple
T27592052
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cortex |
E699806
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUseIndexBackend |
P155397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DynamoDB |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DynamoDB | Statement: [Cortex, canUseIndexBackend, DynamoDB]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUseIndexBackend Context triple: [Cortex, canUseIndexBackend, DynamoDB]
-
A.
hasIndexProvider
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or uses a specific index provider responsible for supplying indexing capabilities or services.
-
B.
usedInIndex
Indicates that something is utilized or referenced within a particular index or indexing structure.
-
C.
canIndex
Indicates that one entity has the capability or permission to create, maintain, or use an index over another entity (such as data, documents, or resources) for efficient access or retrieval.
-
D.
allowsIndexInclusion
Indicates that one entity permits another entity to be included or listed within an index or indexing system.
-
E.
usesIndexation
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on an indexing scheme or index-based method provided by or associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4d71f081909a1235763206b691 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6562fd3488190be1acd8c526a28d2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651a931748190a637e631a52bbfaa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:05 p.m.