Triple

T27585192
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bazaar E699673 entity
Predicate supportsHistoryModel P198988 FINISHED
Object shared repositories LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shared repositories | Statement: [Bazaar, supportsHistoryModel, shared repositories]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsHistoryModel
Context triple: [Bazaar, supportsHistoryModel, shared repositories]
  • A. supportsHistory
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or foundational backing to another entity’s historical context, development, or continuity.
  • B. hasResourceHistory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a record or sequence of past states, usages, or changes of a particular resource over time.
  • C. hasHistoryIn
    Indicates that an entity has a past involvement, presence, or record of activity within a particular domain, context, or location.
  • D. hasHistoricFeatures
    Indicates that something possesses characteristics, elements, or attributes of historical significance.
  • E. hasStructureHistory
    Indicates that there exists a record or account detailing the past states, changes, or development of a structure over time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a4cb8b881909b3a8d630fd89df2 completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff1a972bf08190860696ffcd887c0f completed May 9, 2026, 11:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff184005d88190bf38283ebc499b28 completed May 9, 2026, 11:19 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff1a95b6fc81909331bb03e263b5b9 completed May 9, 2026, 11:29 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:04 p.m.