Triple
T27582720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Domino views |
E699621
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeDesignedWith |
P23439
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Domino Designer |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Domino Designer | Statement: [Domino views, canBeDesignedWith, Domino Designer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeDesignedWith Context triple: [Domino views, canBeDesignedWith, Domino Designer]
-
A.
designedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
-
B.
isDesignedAs
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
-
C.
hasDesign
Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
-
D.
canDesignFeature
Indicates that an entity has the capability or authorization to design a particular feature.
-
E.
hasDesignOption
Indicates that an entity is associated with or offers a particular design alternative or configurable design choice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4cb8b881909b3a8d630fd89df2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71996e1a48190ac59a1d66d7c44e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71820c6c88190ab38b4fa626d22cc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:03 p.m.