Triple
T27562999
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Legendre’s relation for elliptic integrals |
E695822
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in the theory of elliptic integrals |
C11533
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in the theory of elliptic integrals Context triple: [Legendre’s relation for elliptic integrals, instanceOf, result in the theory of elliptic integrals]
-
A.
method in the theory of elliptic integrals
A method in the theory of elliptic integrals is a systematic procedure or algorithm used to evaluate, transform, or approximate elliptic integrals and to analyze their properties and relationships.
-
B.
result in mathematical physics
A result in mathematical physics is a rigorously proven statement that connects precise mathematical structures with physical theories, often clarifying, justifying, or predicting phenomena within a formal framework.
-
C.
result in differential equations
A result in differential equations is a proven statement or theorem that characterizes the behavior, existence, uniqueness, or properties of solutions to differential equations under specified conditions.
-
D.
result in complex analysis
chosen
A result in complex analysis is a proven statement or theorem about functions of a complex variable, often revealing deep relationships between analytic, geometric, and topological properties in the complex plane.
-
E.
Euler substitution variant
An Euler substitution variant is a modified form of the classical Euler substitutions used to transform integrals involving square roots of quadratic expressions into more tractable rational integrals by choosing alternative parameterizations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef53891af88190a193c5e2a1dac9b1 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:40 p.m.