Triple
T27559877
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HTC One X (international version) |
E695742
|
entity |
| Predicate | marketVariantOf |
P64697
|
FINISHED |
| Object | HTC One X |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: HTC One X | Statement: [HTC One X (international version), marketVariantOf, HTC One X]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marketVariantOf Context triple: [HTC One X (international version), marketVariantOf, HTC One X]
-
A.
productVariant
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a specific variant or version of a more general product entity.
-
B.
brandNameVariant
Indicates that one brand name is an alternative or variant form of another brand name, such as a spelling, regional, or stylistic variation.
-
C.
exportVariantOf
Indicates that one entity is an exported version or externally released form derived from another, original entity.
-
D.
denotesVariantOf
Indicates that one entity is a variant or alternative form of another, typically sharing core identity or function with some differences.
-
E.
hasCommercialVariant
Indicates that an entity has a related version that is produced, marketed, or sold commercially.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5387e97c8190a9dab040d21cd048 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65876c52c8190bc889c7a67bd07f3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575d89788190aca478e4aea05a65 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.