Triple
T27555325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchell v. Helms |
E695619
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLocationOfDispute |
P69048
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jefferson Parish, Louisiana |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jefferson Parish, Louisiana | Statement: [Mitchell v. Helms, hasLocationOfDispute, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocationOfDispute Context triple: [Mitchell v. Helms, hasLocationOfDispute, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana]
-
A.
defendantLocation
Indicates the place or jurisdiction where the defendant is located or resides in relation to a legal matter.
-
B.
jurisdictionOfTribunal
Indicates the legal authority or scope within which a particular tribunal is empowered to hear and decide cases.
-
C.
locationOfLawChallenged
chosen
Indicates the jurisdiction or place in which a particular law is being contested or legally challenged.
-
D.
disputedLocation
Indicates that the geographic location is claimed or controlled by multiple parties, with no universally recognized agreement on its status or ownership.
-
E.
disputeInvolves
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5387e97c8190a9dab040d21cd048 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73ae120bc8190bff94d38d7a7a00d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73a38d0848190aa5139144b8561c6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.