Triple
T27555323
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchell v. Helms |
E695619
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAidCriteria |
P55303
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allocation based on neutral, secular criteria |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allocation based on neutral, secular criteria | Statement: [Mitchell v. Helms, hasAidCriteria, allocation based on neutral, secular criteria]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAidCriteria Context triple: [Mitchell v. Helms, hasAidCriteria, allocation based on neutral, secular criteria]
-
A.
conditionForAid
chosen
Indicates that one entity constitutes a requirement or qualifying circumstance that must be met for another entity to receive aid or assistance.
-
B.
hasAidForm
Indicates that one entity provides or is associated with a particular form or type of aid related to another entity.
-
C.
hasQualityCriterion
Indicates that something is associated with a specific standard or criterion used to judge its quality.
-
D.
hasAidProgram
Indicates that one entity provides or maintains an aid or assistance program for another entity or group.
-
E.
hasQualificationCriteria
Indicates that there are specific conditions or standards that must be met for something to be considered eligible or acceptable.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5387e97c8190a9dab040d21cd048 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64dbbaefc8190952b8320bf4397d8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64cacd2c08190aed8a1761d0da679 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.