Triple
T27555296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchell v. Helms |
E695619
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | church–state separation case |
C36209
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: church–state separation case Context triple: [Mitchell v. Helms, instanceOf, church–state separation case]
-
A.
freedom of religion case
chosen
A freedom of religion case is a legal dispute in which a party claims that government action or law has infringed upon their right to hold, express, or practice religious beliefs.
-
B.
agreement between state and church
An agreement between state and church is a formal arrangement that defines the rights, responsibilities, and mutual relations between governmental authorities and religious institutions.
-
C.
secular state
A secular state is a political entity in which government institutions and laws are officially neutral toward all religions, neither endorsing nor opposing any particular faith, and maintaining a clear separation between religious organizations and state authority.
-
D.
separation of church and state advocate
A separation of church and state advocate is someone who actively supports and promotes maintaining a clear boundary between religious institutions and government to protect both religious freedom and secular governance.
-
E.
state church
A state church is a religious organization officially endorsed and supported by a government, often enjoying special legal status and influence in public affairs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5387e97c8190a9dab040d21cd048 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.