Triple

T27553668
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Duty and Interest E695575 entity
Predicate viewOnJustification P36557 FINISHED
Object no further non-moral justification is needed for recognizing a duty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no further non-moral justification is needed for recognizing a duty | Statement: [Duty and Interest, viewOnJustification, no further non-moral justification is needed for recognizing a duty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnJustification
Context triple: [Duty and Interest, viewOnJustification, no further non-moral justification is needed for recognizing a duty]
  • A. viewOnReason chosen
    Indicates that one entity holds or expresses a particular opinion, stance, or perspective about a specified reason or justification.
  • B. viewOnRights
    Indicates a stance, opinion, or perspective that one entity holds regarding the rights (e.g., legal, moral, or human rights) of another entity or group.
  • C. viewIs
    Indicates that one entity is a visual representation or perspective of another entity.
  • D. viewOnGood
    Indicates a positive or approving perspective held toward something.
  • E. viewOnJudgment
    Indicates a person's evaluative opinion, stance, or perspective regarding a particular judgment or decision.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef5387e97c8190a9dab040d21cd048 completed April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 completed May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca204148190850a3dc325bc07b7 completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.