Triple
T2755061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GNU Free Documentation License |
E61079
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCodeAvailableAt |
P41677
|
FINISHED |
| Object | https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html | Statement: [GNU Free Documentation License, legalCodeAvailableAt, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCodeAvailableAt Context triple: [GNU Free Documentation License, legalCodeAvailableAt, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html]
-
A.
legalCodeRecordedIn
Indicates that a legal code is documented, registered, or officially stored within a particular record, system, or repository.
-
B.
legalCodeType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a legal code that applies to an entity or situation.
-
C.
notableLegalCode
Indicates that a legal code is especially significant, influential, or noteworthy in relation to the referenced entity.
-
D.
legalDetail
Indicates that there is specific legal information, conditions, or attributes associated with the related entity or relationship.
-
E.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7a85bc819094a349b84beb1f2c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb718f4c8190bfc34c6597163ebc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82d005c81908a1ac7a1313c6d88 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd91497ec8190927e91ad33549eda |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.