Triple
T2754315
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hammersmith & City line |
E61063
|
entity |
| Predicate | depot |
P14646
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hammersmith depot |
E286904
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hammersmith depot | Statement: [Hammersmith & City line, depot, Hammersmith depot]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hammersmith depot Context triple: [Hammersmith & City line, depot, Hammersmith depot]
-
A.
Hammersmith depot
chosen
Hammersmith depot is a London Underground maintenance and stabling facility primarily serving the Circle and Hammersmith & City lines.
-
B.
Ealing Common Depot
Ealing Common Depot is a London Underground maintenance and stabling facility serving primarily the District line in west London.
-
C.
London Road depot
London Road depot is a maintenance and stabling facility for London Underground trains serving the Bakerloo line near Waterloo in central London.
-
D.
Queens Road depot
Queens Road depot is a major tram maintenance and operations facility serving the Manchester Metrolink light rail network.
-
E.
Ruislip depot
Ruislip depot is a major London Underground maintenance and stabling facility serving trains on the Central line.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7a85bc819094a349b84beb1f2c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb7073d081909da84b21015972f2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afc03e69508190b55a4ad83fca3a45 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.