Triple
T27542773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yes Lawd! Remixes |
E695278
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNewArrangements |
P153167
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes | Statement: [Yes Lawd! Remixes, hasNewArrangements, Yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNewArrangements Context triple: [Yes Lawd! Remixes, hasNewArrangements, Yes]
-
A.
hasUpdatedArrangement
Indicates that an existing arrangement between entities has been modified or brought to a more recent version.
-
B.
hasArrangement
Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
-
C.
hasLiveArrangement
Indicates that there is an active, ongoing arrangement or agreement currently in effect between the related entities.
-
D.
featuresNewArrangementsOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents or includes newly created or reconfigured versions of another entity.
-
E.
hasArrangementBy
Indicates that something (such as a work or piece) is in an arranged form created by a particular arranger.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5386c3e08190bfe33aa326e1f72b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd02680d948190a3463fb119ba8556 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf89c69b4819082bbc564bd15137d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:31 p.m.