Triple

T27541131
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject First Partisan Prohibition E695237 entity
Predicate mayBeEnactedAs P53171 FINISHED
Object law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: law | Statement: [First Partisan Prohibition, mayBeEnactedAs, law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeEnactedAs
Context triple: [First Partisan Prohibition, mayBeEnactedAs, law]
  • A. mayEnact
    Indicates that an entity has the authority or permission to establish, implement, or put into effect a rule, policy, or action.
  • B. enactedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity has been formally established, implemented, or made legally effective in the specific form represented by another entity.
  • C. enactedFor
    Indicates that an action, rule, or measure is formally established or put into effect on behalf of, or for the benefit of, a particular entity or group.
  • D. enactedWith
    Indicates that an action, law, or policy was formally established or brought into effect through the involvement or authority of a specified agent or instrument.
  • E. mayActThrough
    Indicates that an entity can exert influence, perform an action, or have an effect by means of another entity, mechanism, or intermediary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef5386c3e08190bfe33aa326e1f72b completed April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67c9fe7b48190b79b4041357edb49 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678cc272081909e5c70f1bc7407f0 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:31 p.m.