Triple
T2753242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Formalism |
E61037
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesDesignStrategy |
P23439
|
FINISHED |
| Object | raised podiums |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: raised podiums | Statement: [New Formalism, usesDesignStrategy, raised podiums]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesDesignStrategy Context triple: [New Formalism, usesDesignStrategy, raised podiums]
-
A.
usesStrategy
Indicates that an entity intentionally applies a particular strategy or method to achieve a goal or perform an action.
-
B.
isDesignedAs
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
-
C.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
D.
hasDesign
Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
-
E.
designedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7a85bc819094a349b84beb1f2c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb6ed9c08190824d1866e198ef80 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd82d005c81908a1ac7a1313c6d88 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.