Triple
T27531830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ballade in G minor |
E694991
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfFolkSong |
P11404
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Norwegian |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norwegian | Statement: [Ballade in G minor, languageOfFolkSong, Norwegian]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfFolkSong Context triple: [Ballade in G minor, languageOfFolkSong, Norwegian]
-
A.
isFolkSongFrom
Indicates that a folk song originates from or is traditionally associated with a particular place, region, or culture.
-
B.
languageOfMusic
Indicates that a specified language is used in, associated with, or characteristic of a particular piece of music or musical work.
-
C.
lyricsLanguage
chosen
Indicates the language in which the lyrics of a song or musical work are written or performed.
-
D.
lyricsLanguageFamily
Indicates that the language of the lyrics belongs to a specified language family (e.g., Romance, Germanic, Slavic).
-
E.
stateFolkSong
Indicates that a particular folk song is officially associated with, or designated as belonging to, a specific state.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef538608b081908b9f659bb09d5e0f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd485f57dc8190820365396d041991 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd47d35da081908bec8901018d186c |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:26 p.m.