Triple
T27524790
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Philippine scripts |
E694804
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indigenous writing systems |
C30560
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: indigenous writing systems Context triple: [Philippine scripts, instanceOf, indigenous writing systems]
-
A.
indigenous writing system
chosen
An indigenous writing system is a set of symbols and rules for written communication that originates from, is developed by, and reflects the linguistic and cultural practices of a specific native or aboriginal community.
-
B.
Osage-language writing system
The Osage-language writing system is a modern, standardized orthography, including a unique alphabet, designed specifically to represent the sounds and structure of the Osage language accurately and support its revitalization.
-
C.
ancient writing system
An ancient writing system is a structured method of visually representing language used by early civilizations to record information, communicate, and preserve cultural, religious, or administrative knowledge.
-
D.
Mesoamerican writing system
A Mesoamerican writing system is a structured set of visual symbols and conventions developed by pre-Columbian cultures in Mesoamerica to record language, convey information, and represent cultural, religious, and political concepts.
-
E.
Mesoamerican script
A Mesoamerican script is a writing system developed by pre-Columbian cultures in Mesoamerica, using combinations of logographic and syllabic signs to record language, history, and ritual knowledge.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef538550208190aa9de8e2cb260d93 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:23 p.m.