Triple

T27524765
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Panina E694802 entity
Predicate relevanceIn P162677 FINISHED
Object human evolution studies LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: human evolution studies | Statement: [Panina, relevanceIn, human evolution studies]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relevanceIn
Context triple: [Panina, relevanceIn, human evolution studies]
  • A. relevanceDate
    Indicates the date or time at which something becomes relevant, applicable, or significant in the given context.
  • B. relevantToInstitution
    Indicates that something has a meaningful connection, applicability, or significance to a particular institution.
  • C. hasCanonicalRelevance
    Indicates that something is considered standard, authoritative, or centrally important within an established canon or reference framework.
  • D. rankingImpact
    Indicates how an entity’s position or level in a ranking is affected or influenced by another factor or action.
  • E. relevantAuthority
    Indicates that an entity has official power, jurisdiction, or responsibility over another entity or matter within a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef538550208190aa9de8e2cb260d93 completed April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62f2e2df88190948551f6fd67a65a completed May 2, 2026, 5:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f62c1762f881908c25e8f70ecd5041 completed May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f62cd1912c8190ab3f3288442115a4 completed May 2, 2026, 4:56 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:23 p.m.