Triple
T2751847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Internet-Drafts |
E61006
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayLeadTo |
P12716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFCs |
E5627
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFCs | Statement: [Internet-Drafts, mayLeadTo, RFCs]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFCs Context triple: [Internet-Drafts, mayLeadTo, RFCs]
-
A.
RFCs
chosen
RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
-
B.
RFC
RFC is the commonly used abbreviation for Reading Football Club, a professional English football team based in Reading, Berkshire.
-
C.
RFC 1664
RFC 1664 is an early Internet standards document that defined a now-obsolete mechanism related to email or messaging services, later superseded by RFC 1901.
-
D.
RFC 1
RFC 1 is the first Request for Comments document, published in 1969, which laid the groundwork for the development of the ARPANET and the modern Internet protocol standards process.
-
E.
RFC 1666
RFC 1666 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol or specification it defined evolved.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7a85bc819094a349b84beb1f2c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb6d08088190b489de15a120ba3f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afc03e69508190b55a4ad83fca3a45 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.