Triple
T27514762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | state attorney general office |
E694513
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayDefend |
P28479
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutionality of state statutes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutionality of state statutes | Statement: [state attorney general office, mayDefend, constitutionality of state statutes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayDefend Context triple: [state attorney general office, mayDefend, constitutionality of state statutes]
-
A.
defends
Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
-
B.
canBeDefendedIn
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
-
C.
mayDefine
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to specify, establish, or determine the form, content, or rules of another entity.
-
D.
defendedAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
-
E.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef53842afc8190ba6bd4e4999bda67 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62efbe1b48190af1b25c370672eec |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623aaf40081909f947431424a1d55 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:18 p.m.