Triple
T27505783
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Donacobiidae |
E694273
|
entity |
| Predicate | recognizedAsDistinctFamily |
P63805
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 20th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 20th century | Statement: [Donacobiidae, recognizedAsDistinctFamily, 20th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizedAsDistinctFamily Context triple: [Donacobiidae, recognizedAsDistinctFamily, 20th century]
-
A.
recognizedAsSeparateFamily
chosen
Indicates that one entity is formally acknowledged or classified as belonging to a distinct, separate family from another entity.
-
B.
identifiedAsFamilyIn
Indicates that one entity is recognized or designated as a family member within the context of a specified group, record, or setting.
-
C.
treatsAsFamily
Indicates that one entity regards and behaves toward another with the closeness, care, and obligations typically reserved for family members.
-
D.
representsFamily
Indicates that one entity is related to another through a familial relationship (by blood, marriage, or adoption).
-
E.
hasRepresentativeFamily
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular family that serves as its representative or characteristic example.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef538370888190b1ddf53bb4831188 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b903538481909cffcb6cc1cc0e70 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b626120c819097c9ad04487570d7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:13 p.m.