Triple
T27505334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | white-winged chough |
E694262
|
entity |
| Predicate | cooperativeBehavior |
P72738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | group chick-rearing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: group chick-rearing | Statement: [white-winged chough, cooperativeBehavior, group chick-rearing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cooperativeBehavior Context triple: [white-winged chough, cooperativeBehavior, group chick-rearing]
-
A.
involvesCooperation
Indicates that the related entities participate together in a shared activity or goal that requires mutual assistance or coordinated effort.
-
B.
cooperationAmong
Indicates a relationship in which multiple entities work together collaboratively toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
-
C.
cooperationAgainst
Indicates a collaborative relationship in which two or more entities work together in opposition to a shared target or adversary.
-
D.
hasCooperative
Indicates that one entity participates in a cooperative relationship or partnership with another entity.
-
E.
isCooperative
chosen
Indicates that an entity engages willingly and constructively in joint actions or relationships with others, working together toward shared goals.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef538370888190b1ddf53bb4831188 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62ec645f081909207e925cf4c3f8f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623aaf40081909f947431424a1d55 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:13 p.m.