Triple

T27420256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rosalind Ivan E693020 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfAppearance P93610 FINISHED
Object supporting roles LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supporting roles | Statement: [Rosalind Ivan, hasTypeOfAppearance, supporting roles]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfAppearance
Context triple: [Rosalind Ivan, hasTypeOfAppearance, supporting roles]
  • A. hasCharacterAppearance
    Indicates that a character appears or is visually represented within a given work, scene, or context.
  • B. hasMediaAppearanceIn
    Indicates that an entity appears or is featured as media content within a specified media work, program, or publication.
  • C. allegedAppearanceType
    Indicates the type or nature of an appearance that is claimed or reported to have occurred, without confirming that the appearance actually took place.
  • D. hasTypicalAppearance
    Indicates that an entity exhibits the standard or commonly expected visual form or look associated with its kind.
  • E. hasScreenAppearanceType chosen
    Indicates the type or manner in which an entity appears or is presented on a screen.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef5208617081908f731d312e0fd1bc completed April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7aa699d68819081ed363931894ab3 completed May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7a8cec6d48190bebfa884b2f938c0 completed May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:35 p.m.