Triple
T2741316
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yankunytjatjara |
E60754
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguageFeature |
P7162
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mutual intelligibility with other Western Desert varieties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mutual intelligibility with other Western Desert varieties | Statement: [Yankunytjatjara, hasLanguageFeature, mutual intelligibility with other Western Desert varieties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageFeature Context triple: [Yankunytjatjara, hasLanguageFeature, mutual intelligibility with other Western Desert varieties]
-
A.
languageFeature
Indicates that one entity is a characteristic, property, or capability of a language associated with the other entity.
-
B.
hasFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
C.
hasLinguisticFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular linguistic property, trait, or characteristic.
-
D.
hasSubstrateLanguage
Indicates a relationship where one language serves as the underlying substrate that has influenced or shaped another language.
-
E.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b77febc819095603eb012cd141b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb2f210881909126307cc92ebfef |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd829f1e88190aab1d54f87c69714 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.