Triple
T27409267
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pranhita River |
E692095
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedInStateOrUnionTerritory |
P96807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Maharashtra |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maharashtra | Statement: [Pranhita River, locatedInStateOrUnionTerritory, Maharashtra]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: locatedInStateOrUnionTerritory Context triple: [Pranhita River, locatedInStateOrUnionTerritory, Maharashtra]
-
A.
locatedInUnionTerritory
Indicates that an entity is geographically situated within a specified union territory.
-
B.
partlyLocatedInIndianState
Indicates that an entity is geographically or administratively situated such that only part of it lies within the boundaries of a specified Indian state.
-
C.
locatedInStateOrRegion
chosen
Indicates that one entity is geographically situated within the boundaries of a specified state or region.
-
D.
includesIndianStateOrTerritory
Indicates that one entity encompasses, contains, or covers the area of an Indian state or union territory.
-
E.
locationUnionTerritory
Indicates that a location is situated within, or is part of, a specific union territory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5205fc808190ad3efc5525b8e6d6 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fed6da0390819096b88ef4714b144e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed53517d081909966f31707625f1a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:31 p.m.