Triple
T27407467
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gravina Island |
E692044
|
entity |
| Predicate | bridgeProposalFunding |
P112467
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal earmark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal earmark | Statement: [Gravina Island, bridgeProposalFunding, federal earmark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bridgeProposalFunding Context triple: [Gravina Island, bridgeProposalFunding, federal earmark]
-
A.
fundingSourceProposed
chosen
Indicates that a particular source of funding has been suggested or put forward to finance an activity, project, or entity.
-
B.
hasBridgeProposal
Indicates that there is a proposed plan or suggestion to build or establish a bridge between the related entities.
-
C.
possibleAdditionalFunding
Indicates that there is a potential for securing or providing further financial resources beyond what has already been allocated or committed.
-
D.
fundingCommitment
Indicates a promise or obligation by one party to provide a specified amount or type of funding to another party or project.
-
E.
additionalFunding
Indicates that one entity provides or allocates extra financial resources beyond an initial or existing amount to another entity or project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef5205fc808190ad3efc5525b8e6d6 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62cd702e081909f5549c4aa6b837f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623aaf40081909f947431424a1d55 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:31 p.m.