Triple
T27386239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bridgwater Town Bridge |
E691382
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHeritageGrade |
P60267
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Grade I |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grade I | Statement: [Bridgwater Town Bridge, hasHeritageGrade, Grade I]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeritageGrade Context triple: [Bridgwater Town Bridge, hasHeritageGrade, Grade I]
-
A.
heritageStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a particular cultural, historical, or natural heritage designation or protection status.
-
B.
hasBuildingGrade
chosen
Indicates that a building is assigned a particular grade or quality rating.
-
C.
hasHeritageStatusWithin
Indicates that something holds a recognized heritage designation or status within a specified area, jurisdiction, or context.
-
D.
hasHeritageValueFor
Indicates that something possesses cultural, historical, or heritage significance for a particular entity or community.
-
E.
hasHeritageDesignation
Indicates that an entity has been formally assigned a specific heritage or cultural protection status by an authoritative body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef520386788190bc92cfcd97ebb67a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d26ceb08819091c71c001e954936 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:24 p.m.