Triple

T2737471
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 E60663 entity
Predicate reauthorizesProvision P25524 FINISHED
Object Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 E289735 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 | Statement: [Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006, reauthorizesProvision, Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Context triple: [Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006, reauthorizesProvision, Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
  • A. Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act chosen
    Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act is a federal provision that requires certain jurisdictions to provide bilingual election materials and language assistance to protect the voting rights of citizens with limited English proficiency.
  • B. Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a provision that was challenged but ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in South Carolina v. Katzenbach as a valid exercise of Congress’s power to enforce voting rights protections.
  • C. Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a “bail-in” provision that allows federal courts to place jurisdictions with proven intentional voting discrimination under preclearance requirements for changes to their election laws.
  • D. Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a provision that established federal oversight mechanisms for certain jurisdictions’ voting changes, forming part of the Act’s broader framework to prevent racial discrimination in voting.
  • E. Section 6 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 6 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a key enforcement provision that authorizes the appointment of federal examiners to oversee voter registration and protect voting rights in jurisdictions with histories of discrimination.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4b77febc819095603eb012cd141b completed March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdd1fc30c81909ac06588d50abdf8 completed March 7, 2026, 8:09 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b1de83d3008190bfb483e0c1e75700 completed March 11, 2026, 9:28 p.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.