Triple
T27356456
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beilinson conjectures |
E685698
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conjectural framework in arithmetic geometry |
C27991
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: conjectural framework in arithmetic geometry Context triple: [Beilinson conjectures, instanceOf, conjectural framework in arithmetic geometry]
-
A.
result in arithmetic geometry
A result in arithmetic geometry is a theorem or proposition that connects number-theoretic properties of solutions to polynomial equations with the geometric structure of the varieties they define over arithmetic fields.
-
B.
technique in Diophantine geometry
A technique in Diophantine geometry is a systematic method or tool—often combining algebraic, geometric, and arithmetic ideas—used to study and solve equations with integer or rational solutions on algebraic varieties.
-
C.
area of algebraic geometry
An area of algebraic geometry is a subfield focused on a specific collection of problems, techniques, and structures related to the study of solutions to polynomial equations and their geometric properties.
-
D.
set of mathematical conjectures
chosen
A set of mathematical conjectures is a collection of unproven but plausibly true mathematical statements, typically related by topic, structure, or underlying theory.
-
E.
conjecture in number theory
A conjecture in number theory is an unproven but plausibly true statement about the properties or relationships of integers, often motivated by patterns, partial results, or computational evidence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef14887c288190931b8431fdbf53c4 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:51 a.m.