Triple

T27352752
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R. H. Saunders Generating Station E684405 entity
Predicate hasIceManagementRole P162217 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [R. H. Saunders Generating Station, hasIceManagementRole, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIceManagementRole
Context triple: [R. H. Saunders Generating Station, hasIceManagementRole, yes]
  • A. hasManagement
    Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
  • B. hasCustodyRole
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific custodial responsibility or role in relation to another entity.
  • C. isAdministeredOn
    Indicates that an action, treatment, or procedure is given or applied to a subject at a specific time or date.
  • D. hasAccountabilityRole
    Indicates that one entity holds a defined responsibility or obligation to oversee, answer for, or be held responsible for the actions, outcomes, or compliance of another entity or process.
  • E. hasAdministrativeType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or level of administrative classification (such as type of jurisdiction or administrative unit).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef1480a76481908684256ddd5bfda3 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62c1b91e881908798e4f00723efcb completed May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620e4b1c88190a17940251abc68fd completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f621fbfc2c8190bfa802d7dc0f6aa4 completed May 2, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:49 a.m.